Modulus, Reciprocal and Squared Graphs
If you know the graph of , you can sketch a whole family of related graphs without plotting a single new point: , , , and . Each one follows a simple rule about what happens to the -values or the -values. The trick is knowing which key points stay put, which move, and where new asymptotes appear.
Key ideas
Section titled “Key ideas”The modulus function
Section titled “The modulus function”The modulus (absolute value) of a number is its distance from :
So and . The modulus is never negative. Solving equations with it is on the page about modulus equations and inequalities.
y = |f(x)|: flip the negative parts up
Section titled “y = |f(x)|: flip the negative parts up”The modulus acts on the output. Wherever , nothing changes. Wherever , the -value changes sign.
- Keep the parts of the graph on or above the -axis.
- Reflect the parts below the -axis in the -axis.
- Zeros stay where they are, but often become sharp corners.
- A local minimum below the axis, like , becomes a local maximum .
- The range has no negative values.
y = f(|x|): copy the right half onto the left
Section titled “y = f(|x|): copy the right half onto the left”The modulus acts on the input. For , , so the right half is unchanged. For , , which is the mirror image.
- Delete the part of the graph to the left of the -axis.
- Reflect the part on the right of the -axis in the -axis.
- The new graph is always symmetric in the -axis (it’s an even function).
- Every feature with appears twice: a zero at gives zeros at .
y = 1/f(x): the reciprocal graph
Section titled “y = 1/f(x): the reciprocal graph”Each new -value is divided by the old one. This is covered in detail on reciprocal functions. The main rules:
| On | On |
|---|---|
| a zero at | a vertical asymptote |
| a vertical asymptote | the graph approaches as (a hole on the -axis at , since isn’t defined) |
| for large | horizontal asymptote |
| horizontal asymptote , | horizontal asymptote |
| a point with or | the same point (invariant) |
| a local minimum , | a local maximum , and vice versa |
| positive / negative | positive / negative (same sign) |
y = f(ax + b): horizontal changes
Section titled “y = f(ax + b): horizontal changes”Here both and act on , so both are horizontal. Write :
- a horizontal translation of units to the left (right if is negative), and
- a horizontal stretch by a factor of (with a reflection in the -axis if ).
Do the stretch first, then the translation by . (Or translate by first, then stretch.)
The simplest way to map points: the point on moves to where , so
-values don’t change, so horizontal asymptotes stay put; a vertical asymptote moves to . There’s more on this in combined transformations.
y = [f(x)]²: square the outputs
Section titled “y = [f(x)]²: square the outputs”- The graph is never below the -axis.
- Zeros stay zeros, and the graph touches the axis smoothly there (no corner), so each zero becomes a local minimum.
- Points with or go to ; points with stay at .
- Where , the graph moves further from the axis; where , it moves closer to the axis.
- A turning point of at gives a turning point at .
- A horizontal asymptote becomes ; vertical asymptotes stay, with the graph going up on both sides.
Worked examples
Section titled “Worked examples”Example 1: Modulus graphs of a quadratic
Section titled “Example 1: Modulus graphs of a quadratic”Let . Sketch and , labelling the key points.
Solution. First the features of : , so the zeros are and ; the vertex is halfway between them, at ; and the -intercept is .
. The graph is below the -axis only for . Reflect that piece upward: the vertex becomes a local maximum , and the zeros and become sharp corners. Everything else is unchanged, including the -intercept .
. Delete the graph for , and reflect the right half in the -axis. The right half has zeros at and and a minimum at , so the new graph has zeros at and , minimums at , and a sharp corner at the -intercept .
Example 2: Mapping points for f(ax + b)
Section titled “Example 2: Mapping points for f(ax + b)”The graph of has a zero at , a local maximum at , a local minimum at and a vertical asymptote . Find the corresponding features of , and describe the transformation.
Solution. Here and , so :
| Feature | On | On |
|---|---|---|
| zero | ||
| local maximum | ||
| local minimum | ||
| vertical asymptote |
Since , the graph is stretched horizontally by a factor of (towards the -axis) and then translated units right. (Equivalently: translate units right first, then stretch by . The order matters, and the point mapping avoids the issue.)
Check one point: ✓.
Example 3: The reciprocal of a quadratic
Section titled “Example 3: The reciprocal of a quadratic”Sketch for , showing asymptotes, the turning point, the -intercept and any invariant points.
Solution.
- Vertical asymptotes at the zeros of : and .
- Horizontal asymptote , since for large .
- Turning point: has a minimum , so has a maximum . It’s an invariant point, because .
- -intercept: .
- Invariant points where : , so , giving and . Where : , so only .
- Signs: is positive outside and negative inside, so the outer branches are above the -axis and the middle branch is below.
Example 4: Squaring the outputs
Section titled “Example 4: Squaring the outputs”Let . Describe the graph of : its asymptote, intercepts, turning points and the points where .
Solution. First the features of : horizontal asymptote (as ), zero at , so , and -intercept . is increasing everywhere.
For :
- Asymptote: as , , so . The horizontal asymptote is .
- Zero: stays a zero, and the graph touches the axis there: a local minimum at .
- -intercept: , so .
- Points with : where . at , and when , so . The points are and .
So, reading left to right: the graph starts just below the asymptote (because there), decreases through to touch the -axis at , then rises through and grows very quickly, faster than itself, because there.
Common mistakes
Section titled “Common mistakes”Mixing up and . changes the outputs (flip the parts below the -axis up). changes the inputs (throw away the left half and mirror the right half). Ask yourself: is the modulus around the whole function or only around ?
Reflecting the left half for . It’s the right half () that you keep and mirror. Whatever did for negative is lost.
Shifting by b instead of b/a for f(ax + b). For , the shift is right, not right. Factor out first, or map points with .
Changing the y-values in f(ax + b). Only -coordinates change, so maximum and minimum values, horizontal asymptotes and -intercept heights at matching points stay the same.
Drawing zeros of [f(x)]² as crossings or corners. is never negative, so it touches the axis and turns smoothly at each zero. (That’s different from , which usually has a sharp corner there.)
Forgetting invariant points on 1/f(x). The graphs of and always meet where . Finding these points makes the sketch much more accurate.
Practice
Section titled “Practice”1. (Warm-up) Let . Describe the graph of , giving its vertex and -intercept.
Solution
is a line with zero and -intercept . The part for is below the axis, so it’s reflected up. The result is a V shape with its vertex at and -intercept , with slope on the left and on the right.
2. (Warm-up) The points , and lie on the graph of . Find the corresponding points on:
- (a)
- (b)
- (c)
Solution
(a) Make each -value non-negative: , , .
(b) Square each -value: , , .
(c) Only points with survive, and each is mirrored: , and . The point is not on the new graph (the new graph’s value at is , which we don’t know).
3. (Warm-up) The point lies on . Find the corresponding point on .
Solution
Solve : . The -value doesn’t change, so the point is .
Check: ✓.
4. (Core) Let . Its local maximum is and its local minimum is (3 s.f.). Describe the key points of:
- (a)
- (b)
Solution
First, , and the zeros are , and .
(a) is negative for and for ; those parts are flipped up. Zeros , and become corners. The local maximum is unchanged; the local minimum becomes a local maximum . The -intercept is . For the graph now rises steeply to the left instead of falling.
(b) Keep : -intercept , zeros at and , local minimum . Mirror it: zeros at and , local minimum . The point becomes a sharp local maximum. (The old maximum at is lost, because it had .)
5. (Core) Let . Sketch , showing its asymptotes, its turning point and all invariant points.
Solution
Vertical asymptotes at the zeros of : and . Horizontal asymptote .
has a maximum , so has a minimum .
Invariant points: gives , so ; gives , so .
is positive for , so the middle branch is a U shape above the axis with its minimum at , going up beside both asymptotes. The outer branches are below the axis: they go down beside the asymptotes and approach the -axis from below far out.
6. (Core) Let . Describe the graph of , giving its zeros, its turning points, and the exact -values where .
Solution
has zeros and and vertex .
: zeros and , each a local minimum where the graph touches the axis: and . The vertex gives a local maximum .
where :
So at , , and .
7. (Core) Let , for .
- (a) Describe the graph of .
- (b) Describe the graph of , and state its domain.
- (c) Find the vertical asymptote and the -intercept of .
Solution
(a) for , so that part is reflected up. The graph comes down from very high beside the asymptote , touches the axis with a corner at , then follows upward.
(b) This is : the graph of plus its mirror image in the -axis. Domain ; zeros at ; the -axis is a vertical asymptote for both halves.
(c) Map with , so . The asymptote moves to , and the zero moves to . Check: ✓.
8. (Challenge) Let .
- (a) Find and state its asymptotes. What happens at ?
- (b) State the asymptotes and the -intercept of .
Solution
(a) . The zero of at becomes the vertical asymptote . The horizontal asymptote of gives . At , has a vertical asymptote, so : the graph reaches the point , which strictly is a hole, because itself is undefined.
(b) The modulus doesn’t move vertical asymptotes, so is still one, and gives the horizontal asymptote . The -intercept stays at , now a corner. The part of the graph between and (where ) is reflected up, so the graph goes up on both sides of .
9. (Challenge) Using radians, compare the graphs of and for . Give the period and range of each, and describe how they differ at the zeros and in between.
Solution
Both are never negative and both repeat every : the negative hump of on becomes a copy of the positive hump. So both have period and range , with maximums at and and zeros at , and .
The differences: has sharp corners at its zeros, while touches the axis smoothly. And since , squaring makes the values smaller: , with equality only where or . So the humps are narrower, lying inside the humps.