Normal Approximation to the Binomial
What’s the probability of getting at least “yes” answers in a survey of people? With the binomial distribution, you’d have to add up separate probabilities. But when the number of trials is large, the binomial distribution’s bars line up almost perfectly under a normal curve. That lets you replace a huge sum with one quick z-score calculation.
Key ideas
Section titled “Key ideas”Binomial distributions become bell-shaped
Section titled “Binomial distributions become bell-shaped”Recall that a binomial random variable counts the successes in independent trials, each with probability of success . It has
For a small , the distribution can be lopsided, especially when is close to or . As grows, the histogram becomes more and more symmetric and bell-shaped, centred at .
The approximation
Section titled “The approximation”If is binomial with trials and probability , and is large enough, then is approximately normal:
A common rule of thumb for “large enough” is
That is, you should expect at least successes and at least failures. (Some textbooks use instead of for a more accurate approximation.)
The continuity correction
Section titled “The continuity correction”A binomial variable only takes whole numbers, but the normal curve is continuous. Each bar for the value stretches from to . So to match the bars, adjust each boundary by , making sure you include the bars you want:
| Binomial | Normal, with continuity correction |
|---|---|
Here is the approximating normal variable. Notice that and are different for a binomial variable (the bar at is in one but not the other), even though they’re the same for a normal variable.
Hypergeometric distributions too
Section titled “Hypergeometric distributions too”The hypergeometric distribution counts successes when you sample without replacement. When the sample is a small part of the population (a common guideline is at most to ), removing a few items barely changes the probabilities, so it behaves like a binomial with . With a large enough sample, it’s approximately normal too, and you can use the same method.
Why bother, with technology?
Section titled “Why bother, with technology?”A calculator can find exact binomial probabilities instantly with binomcdf. But the normal approximation explains why so many counts in real life look bell-shaped, and it’s the foundation for the margin of error in polls.
Worked examples
Section titled “Worked examples”Example 1: Checking the conditions
Section titled “Example 1: Checking the conditions”Can the normal approximation be used?
- (a) ,
- (b) ,
Solution.
(a) and . Both are at least , so yes.
(b) , which is less than . No: you’d expect only about successes, so the distribution is squashed against and skewed, not bell-shaped.
Example 2: Continuity corrections
Section titled “Example 2: Continuity corrections”is binomial and approximated by a normal variable . Write each probability with a continuity correction.
- (a)
- (b)
- (c)
Solution. Think about which bars to include.
(a) Include the bar at , which starts at : .
(b) Exclude the bar at , so stop at the end of the bar at : .
(c) Include both end bars: .
Example 3: Approximation vs exact
Section titled “Example 3: Approximation vs exact”For and , use the normal approximation to estimate . Compare with the exact binomial probability.
Solution. The conditions hold (Example 1). The approximating normal has
With the continuity correction, :
(Rounding to and using a table gives .)
The exact binomial value is
(On a TI-84: binomcdf(40, 0.3, 10).) The approximation is off by less than . That’s the orange area in the diagram compared with the area under the curve to the left of .
Example 4: A survey
Section titled “Example 4: A survey”In a large town, of residents support building a new skate park. A random sample of residents is surveyed. Estimate the probability that at least of them support it.
Solution. is binomial with , . Check: and . ✓
“At least ” includes the bar at , so use :
The exact binomial probability is , so the approximation is very close. There’s about an chance that or more of the support the skate park.
Common mistakes
Section titled “Common mistakes”Skipping the condition check. If or is less than , the binomial is too lopsided for a normal curve. Check both before you start.
Using the variance as the standard deviation. The standard deviation is , not .
Forgetting the continuity correction. In Example 3, using instead of gives , much further from the exact than the corrected .
Correcting in the wrong direction. Picture the bars. “At least ” must include the whole bar at , which starts at , so you use , not . “More than ” excludes that bar, so you use .
Treating “fewer than” and “at most” the same. For a count, means . The corrected boundary is , not .
Practice
Section titled “Practice”1. (Warm-up) Can the normal approximation be used? Show the check.
- (a) ,
- (b) ,
- (c) ,
Solution
(a) , . Yes.
(b) , . Yes, just barely.
(c) , but . No: too few expected failures.
2. (Warm-up) is binomial with and . State the normal distribution that approximates it, including the standard deviation.
Solution
and , so , with .
3. (Warm-up) Write each binomial probability as a normal probability with a continuity correction.
- (a)
- (b)
- (c)
- (d)
Solution
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d) means from to : .
4. (Core) A fair coin is flipped times. Use the normal approximation to estimate the probability of at least heads. Compare with the exact value of .
Solution
, . Use :
The approximation is very close to the exact .
5. (Core) A basketball player makes of her free throws. She takes free throws in practice. Estimate the probability that she makes at most .
Solution
Check: and , both at least . ✓
, . Use :
(The exact binomial value is .)
6. (Core) is binomial with and . Use the normal approximation to estimate , and compare with the exact value .
Solution
, . Use :
The exact value is . Very close.
(Without the continuity correction, you’d be finding , which is for a continuous variable.)
7. (Core) A warehouse has light bulbs, and of them are defective. An inspector randomly selects bulbs (without replacement). Use a normal approximation to estimate the probability that at most are defective.
Solution
The count of defective bulbs is hypergeometric. The sample is of the population, so treat it as approximately binomial with .
Check: and . ✓
, . Use :
(The exact hypergeometric probability is , so the estimate is reasonable.)
8. (Challenge) Return to Example 3 (, , ).
- (a) Estimate without the continuity correction (use ).
- (b) Using the diagram, explain why the continuity correction gives a better answer.
Solution
(a)
That’s much further from the exact than the corrected estimate .
(b) The bar for stretches from to . Stopping the normal area at leaves out the right half of that bar, which is a noticeable chunk of probability (the bar has height about ). Stopping at includes the whole bar.
9. (Challenge) An airline has seats on a flight and sells tickets, because on average of ticketed passengers don’t show up. Assume passengers show up independently. Estimate the probability that more than passengers show up, so the flight is overbooked.
Solution
Let be the number who show up: binomial with and .
Check: and . ✓
, .
“More than ” excludes the bar at , so use :
There’s about an chance the flight is overbooked. (The exact binomial probability is .)